46. C'mon, TMZ, get real. There is no comparison to being on the cover of FHM, a magazine dedicated to men's sexual fantasies, and being topless while baring nothing on the cover of Marie Claire, a magazine dedicated to women's empowerment and confidence. *rolling my eyes*

Posted at 3:49PM on Nov 15th 2006 by echughes

47. The apple don' fall too fall from the tree...namely...her mama. Two huge creeps. Conceited, self-centered psycho bitches. I am a guy.

Posted at 3:51PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Annie

48. You're right people. there's a HUGE difference between titillating shots in FHM and titillating shots on the cover of MC!! And I can see how groping your own boobs on MC does help the charity in a wholesome way too.....

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Do you morons even read what you're writing?

Posted at 3:57PM on Nov 15th 2006 by racer

49. Posing seemingly nude - if it is her body :/ just encourages the notion that she was dismissing during that radio interview.

Cast my vote for hypocrite too..........

Posted at 3:59PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Pieta

50. Ashley is on the over of Marie Claire, a magazine with a cause, about Women's issues around the world. On the cover she is not showing any body parts exposed. We love her at Blondeheiress.com she is a beautiful, gifted, talented, LADY!

Posted at 4:05PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Blondeheiress

51. What is this NEED for celebrities to bare thier bodies on magazine covers? I'm sick of women walking the red carpets in dresses that barely cover their breasts and rear ends. I am not a prude, but if these women wish to be respected, it's time to show a little class instead of a little a$$. Sorry, guys, but why don't you go back to using your imagination?

Posted at 4:11PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Bettyboop

52. Everyone knows you have to be naked to change the world. Duh.

Posted at 4:12PM on Nov 15th 2006 by NotKim

53. Um.........sorry, I don't know her.........so.........can't judge her.

Posted at 4:20PM on Nov 15th 2006 by C Judy

54. Sorry, there's a HUGE difference between FHM and MARIE CLAIRE! Everyone here is just venting their own preconceived notions of her and using this against her. But I can tell you, I wouldn't be caught with an FHM sub but I do read Marie Claire. I leave it to the pea brains to misunderstand why.

Posted at 4:40PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Esther

55. Ashley Judd is the bomb!! I agree with her...and she is covered and sexy...not trampy like the FHM tramps

Posted at 4:46PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Nancy

56. FHM shows no naked women. Exactly what high-browed purpose is the MC cover trying to convey to you mensa's? Nothing but cheap sensationalism to try and sell mags. Just like everybody else. No wonder you defend the hypocrites.

PS: And we'd have to care to try and understand .....

Posted at 4:53PM on Nov 15th 2006 by racer

57. She always thought she was better than anyone... never cared for her. Or her mother for that matter.

Posted at 5:17PM on Nov 15th 2006 by just me

58. What's wrong with beer, or with masturbation?

Posted at 5:29PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Don A.

59. IT REALLY MAKES ME LAUGH WHEN STARS ARE FIGHTING FOR AIDS THEN GO NAKED ON A MAGAZINE COVER. ONE OF THE REASONS AIDS IS SO BAD IS BECUASE OF PROMISCIOUS PEOPLE. SO LOOKING LIKE A CHEAP SLUT IS REALLY HELPING FIND A CURE. ASHLEY GRAB SOME CLASS AND THEN GRAB A SUIT AND MAYBE THE WORLD WOULD PUT SOME THOUGHT INTO YOUR CAUSE. AIDS IS SERIOUS, WHY DON'T WE BE SERIOUS ABOUT FINDING A CURE!!!!!

Posted at 5:31PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Angie

60. Yeah, Marie Claire...real highbrow stuff.

Posted at 5:32PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Allen C.