Ashley Judd: Naked Hypocrite

46. don't bother.

Posted at 3:14PM on Nov 15th 2006 by xoxo

47. You people are idiots, there is an enormous difference between this shot and FHM. Have you ever heard of CONTEXT????

Posted at 3:22PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Latecia

48. #40 - u are absolutely right. fine, if she's not okay with men's magazines. but you ask "why the hating?" - BECAUSE ASHLEY IS A NO GOOD C*NT! Read all the other posts for explanations...

Posted at 3:25PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Alex

49. So, let me get this right. A skin tight outfit is nastier than groping our own NAKED boobs? I'm not following. So, if it's a men's magazine, its trashy, but if its a women's magazine, its ART?!?! PUH-LEEEEEEZE!

I see where TMZ is going with this. Naked is naked. Either you are, or you're not. And, come on, fellas, you don't care. It all leads to "those" thoughts, right?!?! :)-

Posted at 3:34PM on Nov 15th 2006 by mel

50. Sorry, there's a HUGE difference between FHM and MARIE CLAIRE! Everyone here is just venting their own preconceived notions of her and using this against her. But I can tell you, I wouldn't be caught with an FHM sub but I do read Marie Claire. I leave it to the pea brains to misunderstand why.

Posted at 4:40PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Esther

51. The woman is georgeous..shallow and stuck up but absolutely beautiful!

Posted at 3:37PM on Nov 15th 2006 by usuck*&^*&

52. I agree with btw. the author of this piece on AJ is ignorant about the dynamics of sexism. FHM is for the edification of its male audience and their value of women on a purely sexual level. Marie Clair’s demographic are women and to appear naked in this case is to use one’s body as a metaphor for the level of truthful disclosure about her issues with depression. In this case her nudity is empowering to women. Other examples would be Demi Moore, Lisa Bonet, and even TMZ.com mainstay Britney Spears…all women who have appeared nude on other covers and all of whom have never stooped to the primordial depths of FHM. I love the salacious lasciviousness of TMZ. Seriously, I do. Was even front row center when the Britney/FedEx story broke. LOVE IT! I have probably read more TMZ.com than have seen AJ movies. But in this instance, the author is corny and way off the mark about AJ. As for all of you who think as the author does, pick up the latest issue of “Bitch” magazine to get a good sense of how smart chicks call out the BS in pop culture and deepen your analysis of how misogyny plays out and stop being such DICKS!

Posted at 8:01PM on Nov 15th 2006 by beatyoutumtums

53. Ashley Judd much similar to Jodi Foster are intelligent women. Any movies these two ladies make will always be good. As for nudity, there seems to be total chaos and confusion among the mentally retarded. The type of posing in Men's magazines are spread eagle, skank poses whereas Marie Claire reveals femine exposure while covering private areas. There is a huge difference.

Posted at 3:45PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Lena

54. C'mon, TMZ, get real. There is no comparison to being on the cover of FHM, a magazine dedicated to men's sexual fantasies, and being topless while baring nothing on the cover of Marie Claire, a magazine dedicated to women's empowerment and confidence. *rolling my eyes*

Posted at 3:49PM on Nov 15th 2006 by echughes

55. You're right people. there's a HUGE difference between titillating shots in FHM and titillating shots on the cover of MC!! And I can see how groping your own boobs on MC does help the charity in a wholesome way too.....

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Do you morons even read what you're writing?

Posted at 3:57PM on Nov 15th 2006 by racer

56. Um-- this entry is bizarre-- on your end. as much of a fan as I am of TMZ, this entry is so whiny... Ashley's an activist-- she's on the cover (naked) using what she's got to promote awareness about something greater than *just* her sex appeal, HIV. Duh.

Posted at 7:40PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Catherine Buckley

57. Ashley is on the over of Marie Claire, a magazine with a cause, about Women's issues around the world. On the cover she is not showing any body parts exposed. We love her at Blondeheiress.com she is a beautiful, gifted, talented, LADY!

Posted at 4:05PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Blondeheiress

58. What is this NEED for celebrities to bare thier bodies on magazine covers? I'm sick of women walking the red carpets in dresses that barely cover their breasts and rear ends. I am not a prude, but if these women wish to be respected, it's time to show a little class instead of a little a$$. Sorry, guys, but why don't you go back to using your imagination?

Posted at 4:11PM on Nov 15th 2006 by Bettyboop

59. Everyone knows you have to be naked to change the world. Duh.

Posted at 4:12PM on Nov 15th 2006 by NotKim

60. Um.........sorry, I don't know her.........so.........can't judge her.

Posted at 4:20PM on Nov 15th 2006 by C Judy